Boiler World Update

Forbes Vyncke Biomass Fire Making Industural Installation

Written by 3:42 pm All

Firing Toward Net Zero: The Art and Complexity of Biomass Fire Making

As industries push toward decarbonisation, biomass and waste-derived fuels are increasingly seen as practical alternatives to fossil fuels. However, the transition is rarely straightforward. Biomass firing introduces fuel variability, ash-related challenges, and combustion instability that demand advanced engineering solutions rather than simple boiler replacement.

Biomass Is Not a Uniform Fuel

Unlike coal or natural gas, biomass fuels vary widely in moisture content, ash composition, and calorific value. These variations directly influence combustion stability, slagging tendency, and overall boiler availability.

One of the most demanding examples discussed was Empty Fruit Bunches (EFB), a by-product of crude palm oil production. While EFB offers strong sustainability benefits, it is considered one of the most difficult biomass fuels to fire consistently.

Key challenges associated with EFB include:

  • Low ash melting point: below 750°C
  • Lower heating value: approximately 7,770 kJ/kg

In comparison, wood chips typically have an ash melting point around 1,200°C and a higher heating value of about 9,000 kJ/kg. The lower ash melting point of EFB significantly increases the risk of clinker formation and slagging, which can disrupt operations and reduce plant availability.

Designing Combustion Systems for Difficult Fuels 

The presentation emphasised that reliable biomass firing begins with fuel-specific combustion design, particularly when handling residues such as EFB that behave very differently from conventional fuels.

1. Water-Cooled Combustion for Temperature Control 

To manage fuels with low ash melting points, water-cooled stepgrate combustion plays a critical role. This design allows precise temperature control throughout the combustion stages, including drying, pyrolysis, gasification, fixed carbon oxidation, and final burn-out.

By keeping combustion temperatures below critical ash melting limits, water-cooled grates help:

  • Minimise clinker formation
  • Prevent slag build-up
  • Reduce unplanned shutdowns
  • Maintain consistent steam generation

This controlled temperature profile is essential for maintaining operational stability when firing problematic biomass fuels.

Left: Table showing Ash melting points in °C and LHV in kJ/kg for various materials as follows: Wheat Bran, 700°C, 15000 kJ/kg; Oat hulls, 750°C, 15000 kJ/kg; Sunflower hulls 750°C, 18000 kJ/kg; EFB, 850°C, 7770 kJ/kg; Cocoa shells, 900°C, 16000 kJ/kg; Cotton seed hulls, 1000°C, 15500 kJ/kg; PKS, 1050°C, 13500 kJ/kg; PO fibres, 1100°C, 10300 kJ/kg; Wood chips, 1200°C, 9000 kJ/kg; Wood pellets, 1200°C, 16500 kJ/kg; Rice husk, 1300°C, 13000 kJ/kg; Coal, 1300°C, 23000 kJ/kg.

Right: Graph diagram depicting the same as mentioned above.
Water-cooled combustion concept and temperature zones

2. High-Conductivity Refractory for Slag Resistance

In addition to the grate designs, furnace protection materials play a vital role in handling aggressive ash behaviour. The presentation highlighted the use of high-conductivity refractory linings, particularly in the first pass of the furnace.

These refractories are characterised by:

  • High thermal conductivity
  • Silicon carbide (SiC) content
  • Slag-repulsive properties

Strategically placed, they protect critical components such as collector welds while maintaining stable heat transfer and reducing slag adhesion in high-temperature zones.

Diagram showing relation between thickness of the refractory lining and the temperature conductivity.
High Conductivity Refractory

3. Optimised Furnace and Boiler Design Using CFD

To further refine combustion performance, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is used extensively during the design phase. CFD simulations help engineers analyse:

  • Flue gas flow patterns
  • Velocity distribution inside the furnace
  • Temperature profiles along furnace walls and boiler surfaces

This approach ensures complete fuel burnout, uniform heat absorption, and controlled emissions, even when fuel quality fluctuates. Optimised flow patterns also reduce local hot spots that can accelerate slagging or material wear.

Diagram showing the Velocity and Temperature of flue gas as it flow through the Furnace.
CFD simulation of flue gas flow

From Environmental Benefit to Commercial Viability

Beyond combustion engineering, the presentation addressed a critical question for plant owners: Does biomass cogeneration make financial sense?A case study compared an existing system using coal-fired steam and grid electricity with a proposed biomass cogeneration plant firing rice husk.

1. Existing Configuration: Coal and Grid Power

Under the existing setup:

  • Steam generation using coal costs 119.5 million THB per year
  • Grid electricity costs 68.0 million THB per year

This results in a total annual utility cost of 187.5 million THB.

2. Biomass Cogeneration Scenario 

In the biomass cogeneration configuration:

  • Biomass steam generation costs 141.8 million THB per year
  • Grid electricity demand is partially offset, reducing costs to 15.1 million THB per year

The total annual utility cost drops to 156.9 million THB.

3. Net Savings and Sensitivity Factors

The shift to biomass cogeneration delivers a net saving of 30.6 million THB per year when compared with coal-fired steam and full grid electricity dependence.

Savings can increase further if:

  • Coal prices rise beyond current levels
  • Electricity consumption grows in the future
  • Natural gas becomes the baseline fuel instead of coal
  • Biomass prices decrease
Diagram depicting annual cost bifurcation as follows:
141.8 M THB/year (Steam) + 68.0 M THB/year (Electricity) - 52.9 M THB/year (Biomass)
Diagram depicting annual cost difference between Steam on coal & power grid (187.5 M TBH/year) and Biomass CHP (156.9 M THB/year). Net savings if Biomass CHP is used is 30.6 M THB/year.

Greater net savings if:
1. the process consumes more electricity in the future
2. NG is burning fuel
3. Biomass price is lower
4. Coal price is higher than current buying price
Annual utility cost comparison between coal and biomass cogeneration

Impact of BOI Tax Incentives

The financial outlook improves significantly when BOI tax incentives are applied. With a 100% BOI tax exemption, the project economics demonstrate:

  • Internal Rate of Return (IRR): 17.82%
  • Project payback period: 3.34 years

These figures underline that biomass cogeneration is not only an environmental decision, but also a commercially robust investment under supportive policy frameworks.

Proven Across Geographies and Applications

The presentation also showcased operational biomass plants across multiple regions, including Southeast Asia, Europe, China, Africa, and Latin America. These reference installations demonstrate the adaptability of biomass systems across different fuels, climates, and industrial processes.

Key Success Factors for Biomass Conversion

The session concluded by identifying three critical factors that determine the success of any biomass conversion project:

  • Fuel- Long-term availability, supply security, and flexibility to handle fuel variation
  • Technology- High efficiency, high availability, and consistently low emissions
  • Plant Layout- Well-designed boiler island and efficient fuel storage and handling systems

Conclusion

Biomass firing is not a simple fuel switch. It demands a deep understanding of fuel behaviour, advanced combustion design, and careful integration with plant economics. When executed correctly, biomass cogeneration can deliver lower emissions, a reliable energy supply, and measurable cost savings, making it a compelling pathway for industries moving toward net-zero goals.

Author:

Mr Sakdichote Kijjaroenwong (Chai)
Project Sales Manager
Vyncke, Thailand

FAQs

What is biomass fire making, and how does it support firing toward net zero?
Biomass fire making refers to the controlled combustion of biomass fuels—such as agricultural residues, wood waste, and by-products like rice husk—to generate heat, steam, or power. When engineered correctly, biomass combustion systems can significantly reduce fossil fuel dependency and carbon emissions. By replacing coal or natural gas with sustainably sourced biomass, industries can move closer to firing toward net zero while maintaining reliable energy production.
Why is biomass not a uniform fuel, and how does this affect biomass combustion systems?
Unlike fossil fuels, biomass varies widely in moisture content, ash composition, and calorific value. These variations directly impact combustion stability, slagging behaviour, and boiler availability. Advanced biomass combustion systems must be designed to accommodate this variability through precise temperature control, staged combustion, and fuel-specific engineering to ensure consistent performance and low emissions.
Why is Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB) considered a difficult biomass fuel to fire?
Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB), a residue from palm oil production, is one of the most challenging biomass fuels due to its low ash melting point (below 750°C) and relatively low heating value. These properties increase the risk of clinker formation and slagging inside the furnace. Successfully firing EFB requires specialised combustion design, including water-cooled grates and slag-resistant materials, to maintain stable operation and plant availability.
How do water-cooled combustion systems and refractory materials improve biomass firing reliability?
Water-cooled stepgrate combustion systems allow precise control of furnace temperatures across drying, gasification, and burn-out zones. This helps keep temperatures below critical ash melting limits, reducing slagging and unplanned shutdowns. High-conductivity refractory linings with silicon carbide (SiC) further protect furnace surfaces by repelling slag and maintaining efficient heat transfer, making them essential for reliable biomass fire making with difficult fuels.
Is a biomass cogeneration plant commercially viable compared to coal or grid power?
Yes, a well-designed biomass cogeneration plant can be both environmentally and financially attractive. Case studies show that switching from coal-based steam and full grid electricity to biomass cogeneration can deliver substantial annual cost savings. When combined with policy support such as BOI tax incentives, projects can achieve strong returns, with IRRs above 17% and payback periods of just over three years—proving that firing toward net zero can also make strong commercial sense.